Google’s pitch for the future of game streaming is ambitious, and while the tech is off to a good start, the platform surrounding it lands way off the mark.
source: https://nasibbitar.net
Xem thêm các bài viết về Giải Trí: https://nasibbitar.net/category/giai-tri/
il stick to desktop. tragic launch
It's clear these guys are being as polite as possible but I get it. For starters just slamming Stadia doesn't really do much as there are tons of videos out there already doing that but also because GameSpot is a big company so they can't afford to go thermal nuclear war on a single product as they need to stay in somewhat good standings with most everyone in the industry. Especially a huge conglomerate like Google.
I think it's worth noting, however, that according to Digital Foundry, Stadia does not stream in full 4K as they discovered that Red Dead 2 maxes out at 1440p and there aren't ANY games running at 4K/60. While Destiny 2 runs at 1080p/60 that's not the promise Google made on stage several months ago.
But more than anything else the biggest setback for Stadia is bandwidth usage. On average I use about 75% of my 1TB cap each month (YouTube, YouTube TV, Apple TV+, Disney+, Hulu, Netflix, Amazon Prime, iTunes purchases/rentals, software updates to all the tech in the house, etc.) so adding Stadia to the mix would mean having to pay another $30 a month to remove the data cap. That's $360 a year for the foreseeable future for the so-called convenience of playing games sans console. I bought my PS4 Pro about 5 years ago, had I needed to remove my bandwidth data cap to play games all those years that would come out to $1,800 over that same 5 year period as well as another $10 a month (or $600 over 5 years, which when combined with the data cap removal comes out to $2,400 over 5 years) to play games at 4K.
No thanks Google, I'll stick with consoles.
Thumper……..thats a world i want to get lost in………
Probably the most charitable review I've seen for this
How much did google pay you?